I've been thinking...
For quite some time I’ve been what is called an evangelical Christian, or born again. For me, my Christian beliefs answer those questions of life for which there is no other answer. It has given purpose to my life. It’s challenged and equipped me to be live better than I could otherwise have lived. But there is something wrong with me. I want more. I expect more. And so I’ve been searching.
A couple of weeks ago, I was reading in Mark’s gospel. A scribe asked Jesus about the greatest commandment. For some reason Jesus replied with both the first and the second, i.e. loving God with all you are and loving people as yourself. The scribe replied that Jesus was correct, and then Jesus made an interesting comment. Because the scribe had answered intelligently, Jesus said he was “near to the Kingdom of God”. Why was this scribe merely “near” to the Kingdom? Was it an absence of faith that Jesus was the Christ? There is no way to answer that question. There’s not enough detail in the story. But then, just what is the point of this story?
Perhaps it’s obvious. This story tells me something about love, and its importance to the Kingdom living. Love for God and love for others are at the core of the Kingdom. With his limited understanding the scribe was almost living in the new kingdom. Why “almost”? Is it possible that the scribe had an intelligent understanding of the things of God alone? Did he know that he was to love, but not do it?
And what’s more, just what is the Kingdom of God that is spoken of? I know I’m not living in it. When I look around at the state of the church today, I’m afraid I don’t see it. Why is that? I think this might be important, because it just might be at the root of my discontent.
I recently read Brian McLaren’s book called The Secret Message of Jesus. It challenged my thinking. I need to read it again to be sure I understand it (I’ve given it to friends to read), but McLaren discusses Jesus’ frequent use of the words “the kingdom of God”. At one point Jesus says the kingdom was among the Jews of the time. Jesus was the kingdom, he said. A kingdom is a place ruled by a king. The idea I think is that we have been invited to step into the kingdom of heaven and act in a new way, yielding to a new authority. We’re invited to live in a new reality. This reality is a place where God’s power might be found. People would be attracted to this place.
I wonder if my struggles with my "faith life" are the result of not living the "love life" in this new reality. Because some things seem clear in the story of the scribe. First, love for God and love for others are at the core of this Kingdom. They re not only at the core, but they are inseparable. That I think is why Jesus answered the way he did. He was only asked for the most important commandment. He gave two. The second is like the first, he said.
And I’m sure that I’m not the only one who is missing out on this new reality. In fact I think it’s the problem with this thing today that we call “church”. It is a gathering of people who claim to “believe”, but who have almost no love whatsoever. Certainly not the kind Jesus was talking about. Most of those that claim to believe, sit in church seemingly unable to reach out even to the limited extent of getting up and saying a heartfelt “hello, how are you?” to a stranger who visits, and then listening with genuine concern to the reply. In general, the church today is about formula, head knowledge or mental assent, and programming. There is occasional excitement, if the “worship team” is sufficiently skilled. Some participate in the programming that takes place. But this is not the thing that Jesus was talking about. This is not life in the new reality, the kingdom of God. And so I, and the majority of those who attend church today are no closer to kingdom living than the scribe who questioned Jesus.
And so I’m searching? Am I the only one? Does this make any sense?
